Featured Post

10 Real-Life Costs of Action Movies

Today I feel like tackling a new type of topics which is “Movies”. Action movies are known for their over-the-top destruction, high-tech g...

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Crucial Superconducting Theory Confirmed

photo credit: Magnetic levitation is only one of the many properties of superconducting materials. ktsdesign/shutterstock
Superconductivity promises to revolutionize our world with efficient transport, cheaper electricity, and even hoverboards. Although it’s still a long road to that technology, a crucial theory has just been confirmed that could help.
The superconducting state happens suddenly when electrons in the material join in pairs. This formation is due to internal electrical currents that form the state when the right conditions arise. The theory was first proposed in 1989 by Professor Chandra Varma, and now he and colleagues from China and Korea have successfully proved it.
When some materials are cooled below a certain critical temperature, they become superconducting. They suddenly transmit electricity with zero resistance, thanks to the fact that electrons form pairs and move through the material effortlessly without repelling each other.
“I suggested that this behavior was happening because there was an unusual phase transition due to loops of currents flowing within the material. It was a very bold hypothesis because no such behavior had ever been observed,” said Professor Varma, now a distinguished professor of physics and astronomy at theUniversity of California Riverside
The experiment conducted at the National Laboratory for Superconductivity in Beijing used a laser to precisely measure the energies of the coupling electrons. The values were so accurate that it allowed them to prove that Varma had the right idea all along. The findings are published in the latest issue of Science Advances.
The critical temperature for all the superconducting materials is still significantly below zero, with thehottest superconductor still needing to be cooled to a temperature of -70ºC (-94ºF). But the scientists think their research could help develop room-temperature superconductors, which would allow for more efficient technology that doesn’t overheat, faster transportation, and more advanced scientific and medical instruments.
“I can in my theory predict precisely the parameters that a material must have in order to get higher temperature superconductors,” said Varma. “How can chemists and experimentalists (who make those materials) achieve those parameters? I can’t directly say, but the theory points to a certain direction.”

10 Amazing Photos Taken By Scott Kelly On His Year In Space

Commander Scott Kelly has just returned from his 340-day mission aboard the ISS. The record breaking mission has seen Kelly and Russian cosmonaut Mikhail Kornienko spend almost a year in space, and scientists hope to gain an insight into what long stays in microgravity do to the body, with views on missions to Mars in the future.
Over the last year, Commander Kelly has not only been in charge of the ISS and conducted important scientific experiments, but he has also been an avid scientific communicator, posting incredible photos on his Twitter page. Here’s a selection of his best shots.
This stunning colourful photo was posted by Kelly in February and shows Algeria’s Tassili N’Ajjer National Park. NASA/Scott Kelly
In this tweet, Kelly said: “#Bahamas, the strokes of your watercolors are always a refreshing sight.” The image of the Caribbean archipelagus was taken last July. NASA/Scott Kelly
This Zinnia plant was the first flower grown in space. The commander snapped this picture in January. NASA/Scott Kelly
“#GoodMorning #Egypt! Your colors never cease to amaze! #YearInSpace ” tweeted Kelly after taking this breathtaking picture of the Governorate of Wadi Al-Jadid, Egypt. NASA/Scott Kelly
“Day 207, dusk over the Indian Ocean with a yellow band on the horizon,” this tweet read. The yellow band is the light of the Sun reflecting on the atmosphere. NASA/Scott Kelly
Hurricane Patricia was the second most intense tropical cyclone on record and it was responsible for six casualties. Seeing it over Mexico before making landfall, Scott Kellyremarked on how menacing it looked. NASA/Scott Kelly
This incredible picture shows the aurora from last August. NASA/Scott Kelly
Our homes in the cosmos, Earth and the Milky Way are visibile in this beautiful picture. NASA/Scott Kelly
The Alps and the whole italian boot are visibile here through the clouds. He tweeted this inJanuary. NASA/Scott Kelly
A picture of the saltwater lake La’nga Co in Tibet. It’s Sanskrit name translates to “lake of the demon”, as the lake is devoid of fish and plants. Kelly tweeted this picture in January. NASA/Scott Kelly

Friday, March 11, 2016

The History of Gravity

Our understanding of gravity has gone through a few permutations, from Newton’s equations through to Einstein’s general relativity. With today’s discovery of gravitational waves, we look back on how our grasp of gravity has evolved over the centuries.

1687: NEWTONIAN GRAVITY

Isaac Newton publishes Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, giving a comprehensive account of gravity. This gave astronomers an accurate toolbox for predicting the motions of planets. But it was not without its problems, such as calculating the precise orbit of the planet Mercury.
All planets’ orbits precess – with the closest point of their orbit moving slightly with each revolution – due to the gravitational tugs from other planets.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND
The issue with Mercury’s orbit was that the amount of precession did not match what Newton’s theory predicted. It was only a small discrepancy, but big enough for astronomers to know it was there!
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND

1859: PLANET VULCAN

To explain Mercury’s odd behaviour, Urbain Le Verrier proposed the existence of an unseen planet calledVulcan, which orbited closer to the sun. He suggested that the gravity from Vulcan was influencing Mercury’s orbit. But repeated observations revealed no signs of Vulcan.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND

1905: SPECIAL RELATIVITY

Albert Einstein shakes up physics with his special theory of relativity. He then started incorporating gravity into his equations, which led to his next breakthrough.

1907: EINSTEIN PREDICTS GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT

What we now call gravitational redshift was first proposed by Einstein from his thoughts in the development of general relativity.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND
Einstein predicted that the wavelength of light coming from atoms in a strong gravitational field will lengthen as it escapes the gravitational force. The longer wavelength shifts the photon to the red end of the electromagnetic spectrum.

1915: GENERAL RELATIVITY

Albert Einstein publishes general theory of relativity. The first great success was its accurate prediction of Mercury’s orbit, including its previously inscrutable precession.
The theory also predicts the existence of black holes and gravitational waves, although Einstein himself often struggled to understand them.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND

1917: EINSTEIN THEORISES STIMULATED EMISSION

In 1917, Einstein publishes a paper on the quantum theory of radiation indicatingstimulated emissionwas possible.
Einstein proposed that an excited atom could return to a lower energy state by releasing energy in the form of photons in a process called spontaneous emission.
In stimulated emission, an incoming photon interacts with the excited atom, causing it to move to a lower energy state, releasing photons that are in phase and have the same frequency and direction of travel as the incoming photon. This process allowed for the development of the laser (light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation).
1918: Prediction Of Frame Dragging
Josef Lense and Hans Thirring theorise that the rotation of a massive object in space would “drag” spacetime around with it.

1919: FIRST OBSERVATION OF GRAVITATIONAL LENSING

Gravitational lensing is the bending of light around massive objects, such as a black hole, allowing us to view objects that lie behind it. During a total solar eclipse in May 1919, stars near the sun were observed slightly out of position. This indicated that light was bending due to the sun’s mass.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND

1925: FIRST MEASUREMENT OF GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT

Walter Sydney Adams examined light emitted from the surface of massive stars and detected a redshift, as Einstein predicted.
1937: Prediction Of A Galactic Gravitational Lensing
Swiss astronomer Fritz Zwicky proposed that an entire galaxy could act as a gravitational lens.

1959: GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT VERIFIED

The theory was conclusively tested by Robert Pound and Glen Rebka by measuring the relative redshift of two sources at the top and bottom of Harvard University’s Jefferson Laboratory tower. The experimentaccurately measured the tiny change in energies as photons travelled between the top and the bottom.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND

1960: LASER INVENTED USING STIMULATED EMISSION

Theodore H. Maiman, a physicist at Hughes Research Laboratories in California, builds the first laser.

1960S: FIRST EVIDENCE FOR BLACK HOLES

The 1960s was the beginning of the renaissance of general relativity, and saw the discovery of galaxies that were powered by the immense pull of black holes in their centres.
There is now evidence of massive black holes in the hearts of all large galaxies, as well as there being smaller black holes roaming between the stars.
1966: First Observation Of Gravitational Time Delays
American astrophysicist Irwin Shapiro proposed that if general relativity is valid, then radio waves will be slowed down by the sun’s gravity as they bounce around the solar system.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND
The effect was observed between 1966-7 by bouncing radar beams off the surface of Venus and measuring the time taken for the signals to return to Earth. The delay measured agreed with Einstein’s theory.
We now use time-delays on cosmological scales, looking at the time differences in flashes and flares between gravitationally lensed images to measure the expansion of the universe.

1969: FALSE DETECTION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES

American physicist Joseph Weber (a bit of a rebel) claimed the first experimental detection of gravitational waves. His experimental results were never reproduced.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND

1974: INDIRECT EVIDENCE FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES

Joseph Taylor and Russell Hulse discover a new type of pulsar: a binary pulsar. Measurements of the orbital decay of the pulsars showed they lost energy matching the amounts predicted by general relativity. They receive the 1993 Nobel Prize for Physics for this discovery.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND

1979: FIRST OBSERVATION OF A GALACTIC GRAVITATIONAL LENS

The first extragalactic gravitational lens was discovered, when observers Dennis Walsh,Bob Carswell andRay Weymann saw two identical quasi-stellar objects, or “quasars”. It turned out to be one quasar that appears as two separate images.
Since the 1980s, gravitational lensing has become a powerful probe of the distribution of mass in the universe.

1979: LIGO RECEIVES FUNDING

US National Science Foundation funds construction of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO).

1987: ANOTHER FALSE ALARM FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES

A false alarm on direct detection from Joseph Weber (again) with claimed signal from the supernova SN 1987A using his torsion bar experiments, which consisted of large aluminium bars designed to vibrate when a large gravitational wave passed through it.

1994: LIGO CONSTRUCTION BEGINS

It took a long time, but the construction of LIGO finally began in Hanford, Washington, and Livingston, Louisiana.

2002: LIGO Starts First Search
In August 2002, LIGO starts searching for evidence of gravitational waves.

2004: FRAME DRAGGING PROBE

NASA launches Gravity Probe B to measure the spacetime curvature near the Earth. The probe contained gyroscopes that rotated slightly over time due to the underlying spacetime. The effect is stronger around a rotating object which “drags” spacetime around with it.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND
The gyroscopes in Gravity Probe B rotated by an amount consistent with Einstein’s theory of general relativity.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND

2005: LIGO HUNT ENDS

After five searches, the first phase of LIGO ends with no detection of gravitational waves. The sensors then undergo an interim refit to improve sensitivity, called Enhanced LIGO.
2009: Enhanced LIGO
An upgraded version called Enhanced LIGO starts new hunt for gravitational waves.

2010: ENHANCED LIGO HUNT ENDS

Enhanced LIGO fails to detect and gravitational waves. A major upgrade, called Advanced LIGO begins.

2014: ADVANCED LIGO UPGRADE COMPLETED

The new Advanced LIGO has finished installation and testing and is nearly ready to begin a new search.

2015: FALSE ALARM #3 FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES

The indirect signature of gravitational waves in the early universe was claimed by theBICEP2 experiment, looking at the cosmic microwave background. But it looks like this wasdust in our own galaxy spoofing the signal.

2015: LIGO UPGRADED AGAIN

Advanced LIGO starts a new hunt for gravitational waves with four times the sensitivity of the original LIGO. In September, it detects a signal that looks likely to be from the collision between two black holes.

2016: GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTION CONFIRMED

After rigorous checks, the Advanced LIGO team announce the detection of gravitational waves.
Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND


DID YOU LIKE THIS TOPIC? SHARE IT WITH YOUR FRIENDS SO THEY CAN ENJOY IT TOO..

Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Crispy Grilled Cheese Is The Best Snack Ever

DSC_3894
In springtime of last year, I was in Los Angeles with my mother-in-law, my sister, and my daughter Alex. We went all over the place, checking out restaurants and shops and trying bites of delicious food here and there. We also ate at Sur, the restaurant of Real Housewives of Beverly Hills Lisa Vanderpump, but that’s on the long list of Things I’ve Done But Have Forgotten to Write About. I need to start knocking things off on that list before it gets too long!
Anyway, one of the miscellaneous food places we went to was a cool little establishment called Stir Market, and they had this outlandishly preposterous grilled cheese sandwich, which featured buttered bread, cheese inside, outside, over, under, and all around.
Again: It was preposterous.
It’s been on my mind, so I made a replica yesterday…with one important exception! I did not have even asuggestion of good bread in the house…and good bread is absolutely required if you want to make this sandwich. The bread I used was fine, but it was soft and without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the yeast.
(Sorry. Had a Genesis moment there.)
Anyway, please don’t make this sandwich unless you have a nice, substantial sourdough sandwich bread or some hearty Italian or French bread. One that isn’t soft and that doesn’t easily get soggy.
And make no mistake: my sandwich below turned out just fine! I ate every bite. But to quote the legendary 80’s pop artist Tiffany, “It coulda been so beautiful…”
DSC_3845
First: Usually when you make a grilled cheese, it’s customary to grab…well, some cheese. I used a mix of cheddar…
DSC_3846
And Monterey jack.
DSC_3847
Always grate your own!
DSC_3848
Now, you need some soft, soft butter. This was leftover from some lofty cookie idea I had on Saturday—one, by the way, I got distracted and forgot about. It’s how I roll.
And now I want a cookie.
DSC_3872
Because I used soft, soft bread, I didn’t want it to get soggy, so I just spread on a super thin amount. If you use sourdough or other substantial bread, go ahead and spread on a little more. Just remember that the cheese will produce a little grease as it melts…which is why cheese is so dang good.
DSC_3874
Sprinkle a small amount of cheese on both halves, making sure the cheese sticks to the buttah.
DSC_3875
Turn over one of the slices (yes, butter and cheese side down, but it will be fine!) and put a nice layer of cheese on top. This will actually be the gooey center.
I’m not sure there’s going to be enough cheese in this sandwich.
DSC_3876
Carefully lift the other piece and put it on top of the piece with the filling. Is this the craziest thing you’ve ever seen in your life?
It’s not?
DSC_3878
Okay, fine. Maybe it’s the 17,449th craziest thing in your life.
But at least that’s something!
DSC_3880
Place it in a skillet over medium-low (to medium, depending on how hot your stove gets) heat. I think a nonstick skillet might be the best bet…but I decided to take a walk on the wild side with iron.
DSC_3885
Take a peek every now and then and make sure it isn’t burning…and when it looks nice and golden brown and—yes—crispy (look at that surface!) flip it to the other side. Then just keep on cooking it until the center is melted and gooey. You might need to flip it over another time or two to make sure it doesn’t burn before the cheese is melted. You can always turn the heat down if you feel you need a little more time.
DSC_3892
Ahhh. It’s done! You can see that nice, thin, crispy outer coating. You can also see the softness of the bread. That won’t happen to you because you’re going to use good bread, right?
DSC_3893
Good lands. I don’t say that very often, and when I do, it usually involves melted cheese.
DSC_3894
Enjoy every bite! And use whatever melting cheese you want. (Swiss would be astounding.)
And at the risk of sounding like a broken record: Use good, crusty, substantial bread! You won’t be sorry.
Here’s the printable!

RECIPE

CRISPY GRILLED CHEESE

PREP TIME: 5 Minutes
DIFFICULTY: Easy
COOK TIME: 5 Minutes
SERVINGS:  1 Servings

INGREDIENTS

  • 2 slices Good Sourdough Sandwich Bread Or Crusty French Bread
  • Softened Butter
  • Grated Cheese Of Your Choice: Cheddar, Jack, Swiss, Gruyere

INSTRUCTIONS

Heat a nonstick or iron skillet over medium-low heat.
Spread one side of both pieces of bread with a small amount of softened butter. Sprinkle a small amount of grated cheese on each slice—just enough to stick to the butter. Turn one piece over and place a larger amount of cheese on top (this will be the filling). Place the other piece on top. Carefully transfer it to the skillet and cook on both sides until the middle filling is melted and gooey (watch to make sure the surface doesn’t burn! It should be nice deep golden brown.)
Slice in half and dig in!

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

10 Things We Need To Colonize Mars

Technology advances by leaps and bounds, and it had better keep doing that if we’re going to send people to live on Mars within the next few decades. In fact, NASA plans to send their first manned mission to Mars as early as the 2030s. But there are a few key pieces of technology humanity will have to improve on before we can hope to reach the red planet safely.

1. WATER EXTRACTORS

iStock_000076140209_Small
Despite the recent discovery of some liquid water on Mars, future colonizers are going to be dependent on frozen water trapped in the Martian soil. Extracting that water might involve physically digging it up, or it might mean using microwaves to vaporize the water and bring it to the surface as a gas. Unfortunately, while machines to do both have been tested on Earth, no large-scale water extractors have yet been tested on Mars itself.
And it’s definitely important to make sure that machinery works before we consider establishing a permanent base on Mars. That’s not just so that the colonizers don’t die of dehydration. Some experts have suggested using the water to supply oxygen by separating the hydrogen and oxygen atoms that make up water molecules. If that plan is used and the water-gathering machinery breaks down, the colonizers would be in danger of dying from lack of oxygen. But even if an alternate system of supplying oxygen is used (such as breaking down carbon dioxide from the Martian atmosphere) water would be needed for making fuel as well as drinking. Such vital equipment should be tested in the environment of Mars, allowing flaws to be identified before people’s lives rely on it.

2. MARS SUITS

rsz_istock_000071147309_medium
The environment of Mars presents some interesting challenges, with plenty of dangers that might not kill the colonizers right away, but could cause severe health problems down the road. As such, exploring Mars would require special suits even more advanced than current spacesuits.
For starters, Mars is frequently bathed in deadly space radiation. On Earth, we’re protected from these cosmic rays by the atmosphere and a magnetic field known as the magnetosphere. Orbiting spacecraft like the International Space Station (ISS) are inside the magnetosphere, so only a few astronauts have risked full exposure to space radiation on brief missions beyond low-Earth orbit. A trip to Mars would take much longer, making radiation shielding vital.
That’s particularly tricky for Mars suits, which have to be light enough to wear while also providing adequate protection. One candidate might be hydrogenated boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs). Originally developed to shield spacecraft, researchers have actually made BNNTs into yarn, which could be mixed with the fabric of spacesuits to provide protection from radiation.
Another problem is that the human body tends to break down without the pressure of Earth’s gravity. Astronauts on the ISS suffer from muscle atrophy and can lose up to 2 percent of their bone mass per month. On the ISS this is manageable through exercise, but for long-term missions to Mars, researchers at MIT have developed the Gravity Loading Countermeasure Skinsuit, which mimics the effects of Earth’s gravity by gently squeezing the body. The suit is skintight, allowing it to be worn under larger spacesuits while outside a spacecraft or on the surface of Mars.

3. SPACESHIPS

It goes without saying that putting a person on Mars will be significantly more challenging than landing an unmanned rover like Curiosity. So far, we’ve only managed a handful of brief manned missions to the Moon, which is around 200 times closer to the Earth than Mars is.
But NASA is dreaming big with the Orion space capsule. Designed with a mission to Mars in mind, Orion will hopefully be capable of long-term space travel, carrying up to four astronauts on a six- to nine-month journey to Mars.
However, Orion’s mission to Mars won’t happen until at least the 2030s. First, NASA plans to test it with missions to the Moon and at least one asteroid. The agency is also developing a huge new rocket called the Space Launch System to propel Orion. The first manned tests are tentatively scheduled for 2021, although it now seems likely they will be delayed until 2023 at least.
In the meantime, Orion made its first unmanned flight in December 2014. The mission was designed to test the capsule and gather information on the effects of radiation. At the moment, radiation fromgalactic cosmic rayswould prevent humans from spending longer than 150 days outside low-Earth orbit. A mission to Mars and back would take a lot longer than that, so developing effective radiation shields for Orion will be key.

4. FUEL

At the moment, Orion is a relatively small spacecraft, but keeping astronauts alive and sane on the months-long journey to Mars will require the addition of a much larger “habitat module.” Propelling such a large spacecraft all the way to Mars would require a huge amount of fuel. That fuel would itself add to the weight of the shuttle, limiting room for instruments and requiring even more effort to get out of the Earth’s atmosphere.
One solution would be to find a more efficient type of fuel. At the moment, most spacecraft are powered by a chemical propulsion system. However, NASA is working on a type of propulsion system known assolar electric propulsion (SEP). This harnesses energy from the Sun and uses it to accelerate xenon atoms into an exhaust plume that propels the spacecraft forward. This system would be far lighter than any chemical propulsion engine.
However, there is a problem. At the moment, solar arrays just can’t harvest enough power for SEP engines to provide the same thrust as chemical engines, meaning that an SEP-powered craft would takelonger to reach Mars. This is a major problem for a manned mission, since we’re already struggling to keep the astronauts alive and sane for the minimum six months it would take to reach Mars.
As a result, some experts have suggested that fuel-efficient SEP engines should be used to transport supplies and equipment to Mars. Once the heavy supplies have safely landed, the astronauts could make a faster trip on a stripped-down, chemically propelled spacecraft designed to just get them there safely and quickly.

5. LANDING EQUIPMENT

iStock_000075156119_Small
Even if we had a ship that could carry humans and supplies to Mars, there’s still an intractable problem: We just don’t have the technology to land it safely. We can land spacecraft on the Moon, where there’s essentially no atmosphere. And we can easily land on Earth, which has a much thicker atmosphere than Mars. But the red planet’s thin atmosphere presents unique challenges that make landing even light robotic probes a huge struggle. There is presently no method to safely land a ship large enough to carry humans.
NASA is hard at work on the problem and is currently testing a combination of a huge supersonic parachute and a doughnut-shaped air brake. A test in 2015 was not a success, with the parachute being ripped apart after failing to inflate. However, the test provided valuable data, which NASA plans to use toimprove the design. Since NASA’s mission to Mars is tentatively planned for the 2030s, they have plenty of time to work on the problem.
Meanwhile, the controversial Mars One project, which hopes to establish a private colony on Mars, plans to use a spacecraft that slows itself using rockets and without a parachute. This has never been done before, and experts have described the Mars One project in general as “insane.”

6. GREEN THUMBS

Green plant in a child hands
In the recent movie adaptation of The Martian, Matt Damon’s character Mark Watney is portrayed as a genius botanist, able to grow potatoes in the red soil of Mars. In real life, Watney’s nearest equivalent isBruce Bugbee, the Utah State University scientist behind the lettuce NASA recently grew on the ISS. According to Bugbee, The Martian‘s basic concepts were correct, but the movie underestimated the difficulty of growing plants on Mars.
For starters, Mars only gets 60 percent of the Earth’s sunlight. And Watney’s radiation-shielded habitat would have blocked out even more of the light. In real life, Bugbee says, a farm on Mars would need an artificial light source or a system of mirrors and fiber optics to concentrate the sunlight Mars does get.
Bugbee also says it would be extremely difficult to grow plants in the Martian soil. Appropriately, the red planet is actually quite rusty, insofar as the soil is full of iron oxides. This oxidized soil is not ideal for plant life, so Martian colonizers would need to grow their crops in a system of hydroponics, or else treat the soil to remove the iron oxides and increase fertility.
But thanks to the work of Bugbee and others, future Martians should be equipped with everything they need to grow edible plants on the journey to Mars and on the planet itself. Just a few months ago, astronaut Scott Kelly became the first person to taste lettuce grown in space. Apparently, it was delicious.

7. BUILDER-BOTS

iStock_000042091718_Small
We can’t just dump people on Mars with no infrastructure in place and expect them to build everything they need themselves. All realistic colonization plans envision first sending unmanned ships loaded with supplies, along with robots to do the prep work before humans can arrive. For example, robots could construct livable habitats and begin extracting water from the soil long before the first human sets foot on the red Martian soil. The problem is that we haven’t yet built these builder bots, and the robots that we can currently build are fairly limited in what they can achieve on Mars.
At present, NASA is working in conjunction with two universities on a humanoid robot dubbed the R5. However, some have questioned whether a bipedal robot is the best way to go, arguing that four legs or preferably tire treads would be sturdier. Robot skeptics have also argued against putting too much pressure on our mechanical workers. Instead, they argue that we should simply do as much of the work as possible on Earth. For example, prebuilt inflatable shelters could be set up, saving us the trouble of creating a robot to construct the shelter from raw materials. That would leave the bots free to focus on simple tasks that wouldn’t need problem-solving skills or fine motor control.

8. HOMES

Clearly, a key step to colonizing Mars will be designing specialized habitats for the colonists. These habitats will need to be pressurized to near-Earth levels. They will also need to protect against dust storms, radiation, and frigid weather conditions. And they’ll need to be homey, since future Martian colonists are probably going to be spending a lot of time indoors.
And life on Mars would pose even more unexpected challenges. For example, it seems intuitive that Martian colonists would grow edible plants in their habitats. The problem is that plants produce oxygen, which would build up in a sealed environment until the air became toxic to humans or everything burst into flames. And it’s difficult to vent excess oxygen without also losing precious nitrogen, a vital atmosphere component. So before any space farms are possible, engineers will have to develop a robust system for removing excess oxygen under Martian conditions.
Ultimately, it’s too early to say what a house on Mars might look like. But some of the possibilities are breathtaking. In 2015, NASA held a competition to design a Martian habitat. The winning entry was one of the few to ignore the planet’s red soil. Instead, the designers used an equally plentiful resource, proposing a towering triangular structure built entirely out ofMartian ice.

9. MATERNITY WARDS

iStock_000009906161_Small
Generally, astronauts are forbidden from having sexual relations while on a mission. But if you’re sending groups of people to Mars for the rest of their lives, it’s hard to imagine them all staying permanently celibate. And with sex on Mars comes the possibility of pregnancy on Mars. That’s completely uncharted territory and it’s likely that special precautions would have to be taken to ensure the safety of the mother and child.
The big problem, as usual, is radiation. The DNA that controls embryo development is extremely susceptible to radiation damage. As a result, a child conceived on the journey to Mars would almost certainly be sterile and would run a high risk of mental retardation or birth defects. On Mars itself, the situation would be more manageable, but extra precautions would certainly have to be taken to shield expectant mothers from radiation. It has even been suggested that colonists should establish a habitat in a crater on the Martian moon Phobos, where some crater walls block 90 percent of cosmic radiation.
It’s also clear that a child raised on Mars might develop in different ways from one raised on Earth. In one of the few experiments on the subject, pregnant rats were sent into space and then returned to Earth to give birth. The new baby rats didn’t have a proper sense of up and down due to their development in zero gravity. But the effect vanished after a few days, showing that space babies can adjust themselves to normal gravity.
With all that said, space pregnancy might not be such a pressing issue after all. Researcher Joe Tash has suggested that lengthy periods spent in low gravity could badly damage both male and female reproductive systems. If this is the case, a lengthy trip to Mars would render the first Martians “reproductively compromised.”

10. A WAY HOME

iStock_000019973030_Small
The Mars One project proposes to send colonists on a one-way trip to Mars, with no plans for a return to Earth. Which is probably for the best, since a report from MIT predicts that the Mars One colonists willdie almost immediately. And while buying a one-way ticket to Mars might sound romantic, trapping people in space probably isn’t the best way to go about colonizing the solar system.
Fortunately, NASA does plan for its Mars mission to include a return trip. Of course, this presents a huge technical challenge. Unexpectedly, the journey back to Earth is the comparatively easy part—a spaceship called the Earth Return Vehicle will stay in orbit around Mars until it’s time to transport the astronauts home. The difficulty is getting the astronauts to the Earth Return Vehicle. Pushing through the Martian atmosphere and into orbit requires a huge amount of propellant, which would take years to produce.
NASA’s solution is a spaceship known as the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), which will be sent to Mars years before the astronauts. Once it lands, the MAV will automatically begin extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and converting it into fuel. It’ll probably take about two years for the MAV to fill its fuel tanks, and the astronauts won’t leave Earth until NASA receives confirmation that enough fuel has been produced to get them home again. As a result, the MAV needs to be tough enough to survive the inhospitable Martian landscape for up to four years. NASA expects it to be the heaviest object they will need to land on Mars for the mission to be a success. But it’ll be worth it to make sure the first Martians have a way home.